Quote:
Originally Posted by PPP 
Say what you want about PPA's lack of a publicity arm, but filing a counter productive lawsuit is one thing they did not do.
The business was set back by Casino City filing a frivilous suit that got dismissed and now the mainstream media misunderstands the meaning of that. It was dismissed primarily because they had no standing to file the suit, but it's been repeatedly reported the suit "failed" because it was wrong on the point of law. Similar with IMEGA, although taking the stand that there is a First Amendment right to send money to gambling sites is quite a wild stretch if it ever gets to that point.
|
Agreed; if McCain/Feingold doesn't violate one's first amendment right to free speech, then its a pretty difficult argument to make that limiting where you can spend money = a restriction on speech.