[scrawnybob]

hi

really interesting thread this -

I think you can be honest and upbeat and appropriately negative - but at the end of the day - say you are going to review 10 sites or 20 or 30 or 50

why would you ever intentionally pick and review sites that totally totally suck ? or sites that you can see no merit in - therefore IMHO while the whole points scoring is very subjective as affiliate and as sites wanting to be credible - you wouldnt have any reviews of sites you really would genuinely score a 0/10 or a 1/10

so they may as well all be in the 6 /10 - 8/10 band - which admittedly becomes a bit pointless

plus its all personal - for me I dont like playing a certain top 2/3 site as I think the graphics are rubbish - but clearly loads of people love it

so I describe the graphics as "old skool" but the players are very easy to beat - not so negative but pretty honest without putting off people who would like it - and directing people who would hate it away to something else

so many people like so many different sites for different reasons - IMHO you've almost got to just give them the facts / info broken down and they sort out their own priorities from the information

some people would play at any functioning site for a 100% up to $2500 bonus regardless of the looks or tournaments - while another doesnt care about bonus but wants traffic and regalar shots at WSOP etc

scrawnybob