Quote:
| 3 months is the bare minimum |
I might agree with this for the reasons you mentioned. 3 months probably is a fair amount of time for a player to decide if because of your site they are going to go back and be a real money player. After reading your point with Neteller and everything I agree 2 weeks is a bit short. Thanks for pointing out the obvious that I overlooked.
Quote:
The original affiliate should always have preference over the most recent one. The most recent one likely did nothing to find the player.
|
Disagree. If I click on some dipshits link off of recpoker and see a fancy banner or automatically get redirected to a poker site with their aff. link........... Or even more realistic if I am just surfing the web and end up clicking on a banner and quickly X out of the site. 11 months later if I am at someones site that has a great review and some strategy articles that convinces or sells me on why I should download that software and play there.........then this affiliate deserves the credit in my opinion.
I'm not saying your wrong PPP. I guess it's just my sales background that makes me feel that I should be "closed" by somebody, and that the salesperson who closes me deserves the deal. I agree there are a lot of players that download and become play money only to erase the software and then start a real money account a few months later. I think you and I would both agree that a recruiting campaign of these play money players or freerollers is not going to produce amazing results anyways. I want the folks that are gonna DL today and deposit today or within the week.
Quote:
| Personally I'd love to see a sharing of a player if two affiliate interests are in conflict, but apparently no one in the industry is prepared (or able) to do that. |
Yea you and me both..............but can you imagine being the person employed to litigate between two whiny affiliates. :P